
http://www.delawareonline.com/VideoNetw ... ck_check=1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The victim did everything right - he didn't pose a threat to the robbers.
My condolences for the family of the victims.ClarkLZeuss wrote:Yikes! It's like my friend John has been saying: "Criminals used to threaten to kill you because they want something. But now what they want is to kill."
What really bothers me about this story, though, was this statement from the officer:The victim did everything right - he didn't pose a threat to the robbers.
Yeah. I had the same reaction. Look what he got for doing everything "right". Pulling a gun and shooting the robbers would have been the RIGHT thing.ClarkLZeuss wrote:Yikes! It's like my friend John has been saying: "Criminals used to threaten to kill you because they want something. But now what they want is to kill."
What really bothers me about this story, though, was this statement from the officer:The victim did everything right - he didn't pose a threat to the robbers.
ClarkLZeuss wrote:Yikes! It's like my friend John has been saying: "Criminals used to threaten to kill you because they want something. But now what they want is to kill."
What really bothers me about this story, though, was this statement from the officer:The victim did everything right - he didn't pose a threat to the robbers.
So they are just pandering to the lowest common denominator. Don't want the weak to feel bad about not resisting.baldeagle wrote:In the minds of far too many in positions of authority "everything right" means passive compliance with evil men's desires. Good men will always resist. Weak men will passively comply.