"If we can save just one life..."

[Chris]

I guess he should have let the kid get eaten by the dogs.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... e-charges/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[AEA]

Already running here:
viewtopic.php?f=108&t=62137" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[LSUTiger]

We should be saying "If we could just stop one act of tyranny."

[RPB]

IBTL

old argument/approach



Gene Flick, MD, a psychiatrist – "An open letter to the American psychiatric Association

http://jpfo.org/articles-assd02/open-letter-to-apa.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I didn't grow up with firearms, and when I first looked at the issue, I, too, fell for the "If it saves one life … " argument, as well as all the statistics we now seen thrown around by the anti-gun media. However, as I explored the issue further, I learned that many of the antigun "studies" have serious flaws, and much more methodologically sound studies reveal a net benefit to gun ownership, both in lives saved and diminished crime rates. Guns are used to stop a crime about 2.5 million times a year in this country, and usually never even fired in this scenario. These studies reveal that for every life lost to a gun, 65 lives are saved.

compliments
http://jpfo.org/filegen-n-z/ragingagain ... efense.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;