Federal government to arrest Sheriffs who will arrest Feds

[RPB]

Federal government to arrest Sheriffs who will arrest Feds

http://www.politisite.com/2013/04/02/fe ... -sheriffs/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


#GoodLuckWithThat some States will have Posse laws/Deputizing armed citizens to uphold the Constitution/Law

[JJVP]

Federal government to arrest Sheriffs who will arrest Feds

http://www.politisite.com/2013/04/02/fe ... -sheriffs/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


#GoodLuckWithThat some States will have Posse laws/Deputizing armed citizens to uphold the Constitution/Law

Currently, the state of Colorado is set to be the first to capitulate on allowing imposition of federal jurisdiction on the county level under the aegis of SB-13-013 already passed by the state legislature is now slated for signing by the Governor, Hickenlooper. This bill will authorize police powers of arrest within the state counties under orders of the executive branch (US President) by the Secret Service. The state of Texas, despite much conservative and independent banter by Governor, Rick Perry, is expected to review such a measure next. If Texas capitulates, this will open the floodgates to a host of southern states who have vowed not to bow to federal pressure.

I have not heard anything about Texas looking at doing this. Has anyone heard any such nonsense?

[gthaustex]

Federal government to arrest Sheriffs who will arrest Feds

http://www.politisite.com/2013/04/02/fe ... -sheriffs/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


#GoodLuckWithThat some States will have Posse laws/Deputizing armed citizens to uphold the Constitution/Law

Currently, the state of Colorado is set to be the first to capitulate on allowing imposition of federal jurisdiction on the county level under the aegis of SB-13-013 already passed by the state legislature is now slated for signing by the Governor, Hickenlooper. This bill will authorize police powers of arrest within the state counties under orders of the executive branch (US President) by the Secret Service. The state of Texas, despite much conservative and independent banter by Governor, Rick Perry, is expected to review such a measure next. If Texas capitulates, this will open the floodgates to a host of southern states who have vowed not to bow to federal pressure.

I have not heard anything about Texas looking at doing this. Has anyone heard any such nonsense?

Any such actions in Texas are news to me. I don't recall seeing anything of that sort in the currently proposed legislation. Several bills are just the opposite, holding state officials criminally responsible for trying to enforce federal firearms laws. Those will probably be struck down by the courts, but the sentiment is there. Certainly nothing backing the feds...

[VoiceofReason]

A state or county attempting to arrest a federal law enforcement officer is not the way to go. As a matter of fact it is dumb. A state or county not enforcing a federal law is the best way. That way the federal government would have to try to enforce those laws themselves. I don’t think they have enough officers.

If State, County and local law enforcement does not enforce federal laws, or assist the federal officers in doing so, that will force the federal government into the bad guy role.

Passive resistance. It was proven by Gandhi and others. It works.

Is it my computer or provider but is the Webb and especially this site real slow this morning?

[Chris]

That site has a bit of 'the sky is falling' bias. The bill doesn't say anything about arresting sheriffs. It merely gives federal cops the ability to make an arrest in an emergency when they see a crime being committed in their presence where person or property is in immediate jeopardy. Or if someone says, "Hey, the 7-11 down the street is being robbed", then they have authority to intervene and make an arrest. In Texas, federal cops have arrest powers for state felonies.

Here is another article of many that aren't so 'conspiracy theory' oriented.
http://www.salem-news.com/articles/apri ... ffs-tk.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Personally, I'm in favor of keeping things just like they are.

[RoyGBiv]

Texas has had a similar provision in the law for since 2011, possibly longer...

Statute is here: http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/D ... m/CR.2.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
See Article 2.122

Art. 2.122. SPECIAL INVESTIGATORS.



Text of subsection as amended by Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1223, Sec. 1



(a) The following named criminal investigators of the United States shall not be deemed peace officers, but shall have the powers of arrest, search, and seizure under the laws of this state as to felony offenses only:

(1) Special Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation;

(2) Special Agents of the Secret Service;

(3) Special Agents of the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement;

(4) Special Agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives;

(5) Special Agents of the United States Drug Enforcement Administration;

(6) Inspectors of the United States Postal Inspection Service;

(7) Special Agents of the Criminal Investigation Division of the Internal Revenue Service;

(8) Civilian Special Agents of the United States Naval Criminal Investigative Service;

(9) Marshals and Deputy Marshals of the United States Marshals Service;

(10) Special Agents of the United States Department of State, Bureau of Diplomatic Security;

(11) Special Agents of the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration; and

(12) Special Agents of the Office of Inspector General of the United States Social Security Administration.