The people in Seattle must really be lame

[rp_photo]

This would have been stopped fast and legally in Texas (I'm assuming Castle Doctrine applies as far as a bulldozer threatening your home):

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/2-ho ... 72621.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[jimlongley]

Interesting, I was told over the the Bluebonnet Brigade FB page, that WA state was much more liberal in its carry laws than TX, therefore . . . well, I'm not exactly sure the therefore because the poster was getting angry at me for being a pawn of the NRA and starting to be incoherent on top of already being irrelevant.

If WA's carry laws are so great, why didn't someone put a stop to the rampage?

[rp_photo]

What infuriated me were the "pacifists" who viewed the situation as a threat to property only / let the insurance company handle it scenario.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I see this as legally equivalent to an active shooter on my street, and that I would be justified using deadly force on or off my property.

[Jumping Frog]

I do not know if there is someone in my neighbor's homes, so left unstopped he is a threat to persons as well as property.

A bulldozer is certainly a deadly weapon when used in such a fashion.

[hillfighter]

If WA's carry laws are so great, why didn't someone put a stop to the rampage?

Unless things changed a lot recently, carry laws are irrelevant in you own home.

Besides, it would take people in Seattle more than two hours to drive to where this happened.

[SQLGeek]

For those times when the antis ask if we should be able to buy rocket launchers...