TexasCHLforum.com

This would have been stopped fast and legally in Texas (I'm assuming Castle Doctrine applies as far as a bulldozer threatening your home):

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/2-ho ... 72621.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Interesting, I was told over the the Bluebonnet Brigade FB page, that WA state was much more liberal in its carry laws than TX, therefore . . . well, I'm not exactly sure the therefore because the poster was getting angry at me for being a pawn of the NRA and starting to be incoherent on top of already being irrelevant.

If WA's carry laws are so great, why didn't someone put a stop to the rampage?

What infuriated me were the "pacifists" who viewed the situation as a threat to property only / let the insurance company handle it scenario.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I see this as legally equivalent to an active shooter on my street, and that I would be justified using deadly force on or off my property.

I do not know if there is someone in my neighbor's homes, so left unstopped he is a threat to persons as well as property.

A bulldozer is certainly a deadly weapon when used in such a fashion.

jimlongley wrote:If WA's carry laws are so great, why didn't someone put a stop to the rampage?

Unless things changed a lot recently, carry laws are irrelevant in you own home.

Besides, it would take people in Seattle more than two hours to drive to where this happened.

For those times when the antis ask if we should be able to buy rocket launchers...