http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2013/05/ar ... ntier.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I hadn't thought through the analogy before, re: The US from roughly 1585 through 1885 always had a "life on the frontier" that was always beyond the rule of law. Now in modern America, that lawless frontier has moved into the inner cities.During much of the United States' existence, a significant portion of the population lived near the uncivilized frontier. The frontier was a place where the laws of civilization did not reach, where Judeo/Christian morals were not in the ascendancy, a place of danger, where travelers must always be on their guard, where savage tribes held sway, a land often as not immersed in a low level of war, either between the tribes or between a tribe and western civilization, and where a man depended on his wits and weapons, and was not able to depend upon the force of law.
. . .
The rise of these multitudes, primarily concentrated in the inner city cores, have brought about an era of American history with a new, urban, frontier.
Once again, most of the country is safe, while those who live next to the modern frontier have to be on constant guard of their lives and their possessions. In the modern frontier, the rule of law and Western Civilization has broken down. A man travels there at his peril. It is once again necessary to depend on one's wits and ones weapons for safety. The tribes of the modern frontier are often at war, and a low state of warfare continually exists with the rest of the nation. As in the past, the level of violent death outside the modern frontier and its borders is quite low, approximating that of other Western civilizations. Inside the frontier, violent death rates are much higher, and approximate that of other societies where the rule of law is not dependable.
Of course, the difference between the original frontier and the new urban frontier is civilization was constantly expanding and pushing back the original frontier. Today the opposite is happening.
Progressives. Anything but progressive. They should be called "Retrogressives".