Missouri Governor Vetoes Bill That Nullified Federal Gun Law

Discussion of other state's CHL's & reciprocity

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B

Post Reply
gthaustex
Senior Member
Posts: 1318
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 9:38 am

Missouri Governor Vetoes Bill That Nullified Federal Gun Law

Post by gthaustex »

The Governor of Missouri vetoed a bill that would have attempted to nullify Federal gun laws. I thought it interesting that he also noted that there were some 1st Amendment gotchas in there, such as making it a misdemeanor to publish the name of a gun owner. His take was that people publish their photos with a hunting trophy all the time and this bill would make that illegal, thus violating the 1st Amendment...

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07 ... -gun-laws/
User avatar
Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Missouri Governor Vetoes Bill That Nullified Federal Gun

Post by Oldgringo »

Missouri is not called the "Show Me State" without reason.
User avatar
Keith B
Moderator
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Missouri Governor Vetoes Bill That Nullified Federal Gun

Post by Keith B »

There had to be some other items in this bill that were more than gun related for Jay Nixon to veto it. He is one of the most pro-gun Governor's you will ever find. He was the one who helped push the concealed carry law through in Missouri when he was Attorney General.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
gthaustex
Senior Member
Posts: 1318
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 9:38 am

Re: Missouri Governor Vetoes Bill That Nullified Federal Gun

Post by gthaustex »

Keith B wrote:There had to be some other items in this bill that were more than gun related for Jay Nixon to veto it. He is one of the most pro-gun Governor's you will ever find. He was the one who helped push the concealed carry law through in Missouri when he was Attorney General.
I agree. There were several items in the bill, including the publication of photos being considered as publishing gun owners names (even if they paid to have them published). The way it was written into the bill, it made the publication a possible misdemeanor for the papers. The intent was to avoid having something similar to what happened in NY happen in Missouri. I think several parts of the bill were badly crafted / worded and that is why it got the veto.
Post Reply

Return to “Other States”