Destruction of German Civilian Firearms 1945
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Destruction of German Civilian Firearms 1945
Look at all these beautiful firearms being destroyed by the US Army. Boy oh boy, wish I could get several of them today...Must be soldiers from New Jersey.
[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=YfbcL_sP6z0[/youtube]
[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=YfbcL_sP6z0[/youtube]
Unless we keep the barbarian virtues, gaining the civilized ones will be of little avail. Oversentimentality, oversoftness, washiness, and mushiness are the great dangers of this age and of this people." Teddy Roosevelt"
DEB=Daniel E Bertram
U.S. Army Retired, (Sapper). VFW Life Member.
DEB=Daniel E Bertram
U.S. Army Retired, (Sapper). VFW Life Member.
Re: Destruction of German Civilian Firearms 1945
Since Hitler had all the firearms registered they were probably easy to find.
I'm sad that the US Army was involved. Makes you wonder though... If they did it once I'd bet that they would do it again if the politicians and "leadership" asked them to.
I'm sad that the US Army was involved. Makes you wonder though... If they did it once I'd bet that they would do it again if the politicians and "leadership" asked them to.
N5PNZ
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2574
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:27 pm
- Location: Vernon, Texas
Re: Destruction of German Civilian Firearms 1945
While I understand the destruction of certain types of firearms in the push to "demilitarize" Germany, breaking all of those fine double shotguns, for example, was simply ridiculous. I'm sure they did it to make sure "the job was done right", and so no one would have to think about it too much, just get all of them and break them, done deal. Typical bureaucratic mindset.
Re: Destruction of German Civilian Firearms 1945
The amount of havoc a few diehard Nazis could have done with these guns albeit limited could have been destructive to the whole operation. Look at the insurgency in Iraq, it's still going on after all these years.
"To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
Texas and Louisiana CHL Instructor, NRA Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Personal Protection and Refuse To Be A Victim Instructor
George Mason
Texas and Louisiana CHL Instructor, NRA Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Personal Protection and Refuse To Be A Victim Instructor
Re: Destruction of German Civilian Firearms 1945
Those diehard Nazis, were probably already very well armed, as it was part and parcel of the regime to have a "Nazi partisan" in place with arms/material when the Allies conquered an area. These were the Werewolf movement. But, the German people were probably pretty much fought out, maybe someone would have taken an old double barrel and shot at an American Soldier, but I doubt it. The Germans have never been very adept at being anti-government throughout their history. Destroying old firearms, that was probably only maintained by the upper Middle to upper strata of society just seems a waste to me, but I am a Gun lover the Liberals really enjoy spooking their kids with. I spoke with many old WWII Veterans of the Pacific, and when they entered Japan, they also destroyed all firearms or swords, or sent them home. Needed to destroy the symbolism of freedom of the people to insure they understood they were defeated. We did the same when we first entered Bosnia. Aw well, the past is the past, just seeing these fine old firearms being destroyed hit my soul, regardless of the reasons it was done.MoJo wrote:The amount of havoc a few diehard Nazis could have done with these guns albeit limited could have been destructive to the whole operation. Look at the insurgency in Iraq, it's still going on after all these years.
Unless we keep the barbarian virtues, gaining the civilized ones will be of little avail. Oversentimentality, oversoftness, washiness, and mushiness are the great dangers of this age and of this people." Teddy Roosevelt"
DEB=Daniel E Bertram
U.S. Army Retired, (Sapper). VFW Life Member.
DEB=Daniel E Bertram
U.S. Army Retired, (Sapper). VFW Life Member.
Re: Destruction of German Civilian Firearms 1945
I don't know, but I suspect asking a bunch of GIs to destroy some firearms from the country that had just been trying to kill them might hit a different emotional nerve than asking them to go round up their buddies' and grandfathers' firearms and destroying those. While not naive about the power of an employer, I don't think our average military/National Guard/LEO personnel are going to easily take to rounding up our firearms. At least not en-masse. At least not today. The sheriffs in Colorado are a good example of the pushback they'd receive. I have many a reservist in the family that would push back greatly. Northern Colorado might be the first (half of a) state to secede.2farnorth wrote:Since Hitler had all the firearms registered they were probably easy to find.
I'm sad that the US Army was involved. Makes you wonder though... If they did it once I'd bet that they would do it again if the politicians and "leadership" asked them to.
NRA Endowment - NRA RSO - Μολὼν λάβε
Re: Destruction of German Civilian Firearms 1945
Unfortunately, just not too long ago, LEO was ordered to confiscate guns in the New Orleans area following the Hurricane Katrina aftermath.goose wrote:I don't know, but I suspect asking a bunch of GIs to destroy some firearms from the country that had just been trying to kill them might hit a different emotional nerve than asking them to go round up their buddies' and grandfathers' firearms and destroying those. While not naive about the power of an employer, I don't think our average military/National Guard/LEO personnel are going to easily take to rounding up our firearms. At least not en-masse. At least not today. The sheriffs in Colorado are a good example of the pushback they'd receive. I have many a reservist in the family that would push back greatly. Northern Colorado might be the first (half of a) state to secede.2farnorth wrote:Since Hitler had all the firearms registered they were probably easy to find.
I'm sad that the US Army was involved. Makes you wonder though... If they did it once I'd bet that they would do it again if the politicians and "leadership" asked them to.
Ed
- Purplehood
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4638
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: Destruction of German Civilian Firearms 1945
I don't think it would have bothered me in the least to confiscate firearms from a defeated enemy that is not covered by the US Bill of Rights. I never would have thought of it.goose wrote:I don't know, but I suspect asking a bunch of GIs to destroy some firearms from the country that had just been trying to kill them might hit a different emotional nerve than asking them to go round up their buddies' and grandfathers' firearms and destroying those. While not naive about the power of an employer, I don't think our average military/National Guard/LEO personnel are going to easily take to rounding up our firearms. At least not en-masse. At least not today. The sheriffs in Colorado are a good example of the pushback they'd receive. I have many a reservist in the family that would push back greatly. Northern Colorado might be the first (half of a) state to secede.2farnorth wrote:Since Hitler had all the firearms registered they were probably easy to find.
I'm sad that the US Army was involved. Makes you wonder though... If they did it once I'd bet that they would do it again if the politicians and "leadership" asked them to.
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
Re: Destruction of German Civilian Firearms 1945
I don't disagree that it can happen. NYC, urban parts of Cali, etc come to mind as well. I would still guess that asking this same thing after a flood in the midwest, which has happened often, would get a different response. I also submit that NOLA is not a good representation of the rest of the US, or the rest of the LEO community. Wait, add Chicago to the "possibles" list. :-)equin wrote:Unfortunately, just not too long ago, LEO was ordered to confiscate guns in the New Orleans area following the Hurricane Katrina aftermath.goose wrote: I don't know, but I suspect asking a bunch of GIs to destroy some firearms from the country that had just been trying to kill them might hit a different emotional nerve than asking them to go round up their buddies' and grandfathers' firearms and destroying those. While not naive about the power of an employer, I don't think our average military/National Guard/LEO personnel are going to easily take to rounding up our firearms. At least not en-masse. At least not today. The sheriffs in Colorado are a good example of the pushback they'd receive. I have many a reservist in the family that would push back greatly. Northern Colorado might be the first (half of a) state to secede.
NRA Endowment - NRA RSO - Μολὼν λάβε
Re: Destruction of German Civilian Firearms 1945
Also, at the time, there was both talk and fear of a large insurgency, though it never materialized.MoJo wrote:The amount of havoc a few diehard Nazis could have done with these guns albeit limited could have been destructive to the whole operation. Look at the insurgency in Iraq, it's still going on after all these years.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."
From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com