Trooper engages man, after man starts shooting

Reports of actual crimes and investigations, not hypothetical situations.

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B

CHLLady
Senior Member
Posts: 798
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:27 am
Location: DFW

Trooper engages man, after man starts shooting

Post by CHLLady »

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ico=ushome" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;^editors_choice_six_of_the_best

Saw a bit of this on Foxnews this morning, but couldn't find it anywhere but the DM. The man was stopped by the trooper for speeding through a construction zone, when suddenly the guy gets out and has his hand behind his back in an aggressive stance. The man does not follow the trooper's orders, starts approaching the officer then starts shooting.

I knew something was wrong when the guy got out wearing the rag on his head, you can't wear them while in uniform in public. The officer shows excellent restraint, but sure jeopardized himself by letting him get too close. It's not clear at what point the officer draws, as he is not seen in the video. Also disturbing is the cousin's comments on the shooter. This guy was a reservist, not a Seal. I wonder at this man's mental health, possibly PTSD sufferer?
If you carry a gun, people call you paranoid. Nonsense! If you carry a gun, what do you have to be paranoid about?
EEllis
Banned
Posts: 1888
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:54 pm

Re: Trooper engages man, after man starts shooting

Post by EEllis »

CHLLady wrote: I wonder at this man's mental health, possibly PTSD sufferer?
PTSD is an anxiety disorder. The symptoms of which occur only after a trauma and last for over a month. You get sleep disorders, nightmares, anxiety, nervousness, depression, and even flashbacks and hallucinations. What it does not cause is psychopathic or sociopathic behavior. It may increase the likelihood of certain traits coming out but doesn't cause them to occur. I only bring this up because the recurring refrain of people who don't really understand PTSD and seem to lump multiple disorders under on heading or even give reasons that we should be concerned about our returning troops because of PTSD issues. The result of this is to stigmatize not only veterans with PTSD, but all PTSD sufferers, as being potentially dangerous. In fact, not one single research study that I have seen links violent behavior with the diagnosis of PTSD. Now if we are talking wartime injuries then TBI (traumatic brain injury) or some pre existing condition that may have been aggravated by his service are much more likely as culprits.
User avatar
E.Marquez
Senior Member
Posts: 2781
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:48 pm
Location: Kempner
Contact:

Re: Trooper engages man, after man starts shooting

Post by E.Marquez »

CHLLady wrote: This guy was a reservist, not a Seal. I wonder at this man's mental health, possibly PTSD sufferer?
"former Army Reserve" at least from the media reports
"According to US Army records, Van Allen served in the army reserve from October 2009 through July 2012. He did his training at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri and in New Kensington, Pennsylvania and worked as a construction engineer. His highest rank was private first class."
"Court records show an extensive arrest record in the Pittsburgh area, mostly for traffic offenses, including speeding, running a red light and driving with a suspended license.
He pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct in March 2011 after getting into a fight. He and his ex-wife, Amie Allen, lost their home in Pittsburgh to foreclosure in 2009, according to court documents.
In February, Allen tried to secure a restraining order against his ex-wife through Multnomah County Circuit Court; the petition was denied because he failed to establish a claim, court records show."
So guy is driving across country in full uniform and a dew-rag... ,, Id'd hazard a guess that that is an indicator (after the fact, not something the LEO could have known) of some issues.....
Last edited by E.Marquez on Sat Oct 05, 2013 8:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
Companion animal Microchips, quality name brand chips, lifetime registration, Low cost just $10~12, not for profit, most locations we can come to you. We cover eight counties McLennan, Hill, Bell, Coryell, Falls, Bosque, Limestone, Lampasas
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com
User avatar
baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Trooper engages man, after man starts shooting

Post by baldeagle »

'He would have never shot at a police official or anyone of the law,' his cousin, Will Wright III, said. 'He would not have missed the kill shot either.'
And yet the video doesn't lie. He did shoot at the trooper, and he did miss the kill shot. Family members so often cannot admit the truth, even when it stares them in the face.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
User avatar
johncanfield
Senior Member
Posts: 1090
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 9:04 pm
Location: Texas Hill Country

Re: Trooper engages man, after man starts shooting

Post by johncanfield »

Wow, the trooper hit the perp in the chest and he still functioned for a while.
LC9s, M&P 22, 9c, Sig P238-P239-P226-P365XL, 1911 clone
texanjoker

Re: Trooper engages man, after man starts shooting

Post by texanjoker »

I had started to post this story yesterday but chose not to. I wanted to create a discussion showing the video in this post vs. a recent video in Austin, where they fired the officer for taking a shot. The video in this thread shows what happens when you wait to long.

This is the video from the Austin shooting. I am wondering if he will win an appeal as Acevedo is under heat for a recent shooting (not this one) by the usual people here in Liberal Austin.

http://www.statesman.com/news/news/poli ... ng-/nZ9N8/
User avatar
rbwhatever1
Senior Member
Posts: 1434
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:16 pm
Location: Paradise Texas

Re: Trooper engages man, after man starts shooting

Post by rbwhatever1 »

You can take a thug out of the city but you will never take "the thug" out of "a thug". It's their nature and always will be.
III
CHLLady
Senior Member
Posts: 798
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:27 am
Location: DFW

Re: Trooper engages man, after man starts shooting

Post by CHLLady »

EEllis wrote:
CHLLady wrote: I wonder at this man's mental health, possibly PTSD sufferer?
PTSD is an anxiety disorder. The symptoms of which occur only after a trauma and last for over a month. You get sleep disorders, nightmares, anxiety, nervousness, depression, and even flashbacks and hallucinations. What it does not cause is psychopathic or sociopathic behavior. It may increase the likelihood of certain traits coming out but doesn't cause them to occur. I only bring this up because the recurring refrain of people who don't really understand PTSD and seem to lump multiple disorders under on heading or even give reasons that we should be concerned about our returning troops because of PTSD issues. The result of this is to stigmatize not only veterans with PTSD, but all PTSD sufferers, as being potentially dangerous. In fact, not one single research study that I have seen links violent behavior with the diagnosis of PTSD. Now if we are talking wartime injuries then TBI (traumatic brain injury) or some pre existing condition that may have been aggravated by his service are much more likely as culprits.

Yes, I do understand what PTSD is, it is very close to me. I would never stigmatize anyone suffering from it. But the fact is all or some of those symptoms can cause stress. Stress and lack of sleep caused by the effects of PTSD can and do cause some to act in ways they would not normally, which can lead to relationship, social, and family issues. Unfortunately, it also leads to suicide if they can't get good help. They said it was what Chris Kyle's shooter was dealing with.

Emarquez, I did say, "was" as in past tense, but "former" expresses it better, if you want to quibble. ;-) He had been out of the service a good while. I know after hubby served his time, he was ready to take off his uniform.
If you carry a gun, people call you paranoid. Nonsense! If you carry a gun, what do you have to be paranoid about?
User avatar
E.Marquez
Senior Member
Posts: 2781
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:48 pm
Location: Kempner
Contact:

Re: Trooper engages man, after man starts shooting

Post by E.Marquez »

CHLLady wrote: Emarquez, I did say, "was" as in past tense, but "former" expresses it better, if you want to quibble. ;-) He had been out of the service a good while. I know after hubby served his time, he was ready to take off his uniform.
No quibble... just clarifying comments :tiphat:

As to PTSD.... the Docs don't agree what it is, or what to categorize it as... .. So calling it this or that is just terms of convenience, nothing more.
There are many groups including some researchers and PHD's that refuse to call it by the stigma inducing word of "disorder"
Companion animal Microchips, quality name brand chips, lifetime registration, Low cost just $10~12, not for profit, most locations we can come to you. We cover eight counties McLennan, Hill, Bell, Coryell, Falls, Bosque, Limestone, Lampasas
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com
User avatar
drjoker
Banned
Posts: 1315
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 12:19 am

Re: Trooper engages man, after man starts shooting

Post by drjoker »

CHLLady wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... f_the_best

Saw a bit of this on Foxnews this morning, but couldn't find it anywhere but the DM. The man was stopped by the trooper for speeding through a construction zone, when suddenly the guy gets out and has his hand behind his back in an aggressive stance. The man does not follow the trooper's orders, starts approaching the officer then starts shooting.

I knew something was wrong when the guy got out wearing the rag on his head, you can't wear them while in uniform in public. The officer shows excellent restraint, but sure jeopardized himself by letting him get too close. It's not clear at what point the officer draws, as he is not seen in the video. Also disturbing is the cousin's comments on the shooter. This guy was a reservist, not a Seal. I wonder at this man's mental health, possibly PTSD sufferer?
This other video from another thread has an interview with the perp's aunt at the end saying that he was just trying to take his kids on a road trip.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/10 ... icer#star7

She forgot to add that it was a road trip to go to the store to buy skittles and iced tea :fire "rlol"
User avatar
jmra
Senior Member
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: Trooper engages man, after man starts shooting

Post by jmra »

drjoker wrote:
CHLLady wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... f_the_best

Saw a bit of this on Foxnews this morning, but couldn't find it anywhere but the DM. The man was stopped by the trooper for speeding through a construction zone, when suddenly the guy gets out and has his hand behind his back in an aggressive stance. The man does not follow the trooper's orders, starts approaching the officer then starts shooting.

I knew something was wrong when the guy got out wearing the rag on his head, you can't wear them while in uniform in public. The officer shows excellent restraint, but sure jeopardized himself by letting him get too close. It's not clear at what point the officer draws, as he is not seen in the video. Also disturbing is the cousin's comments on the shooter. This guy was a reservist, not a Seal. I wonder at this man's mental health, possibly PTSD sufferer?
This other video from another thread has an interview with the perp's aunt at the end saying that he was just trying to take his kids on a road trip.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/10 ... icer#star7

She forgot to add that it was a road trip to go to the store to buy skittles and iced tea :fire "rlol"
The aunts comments are beyond strange. Not even sure what she is trying to convey.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
Greybeard
Senior Member
Posts: 2415
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: Denton County
Contact:

Re: Trooper engages man, after man starts shooting

Post by Greybeard »

I noticed Allen started shooting with his LEFT hand, which is likely the cause of inadvertently hitting the magazine release in the midst of it all - and it may have saved the trooper's life. I think those last two shots heard off camera had to come from the trooper - because Allen's magazine was on the ground. And he reinserted it so quickly, I think he was probably right handed. And yep, Allen still quite agile, to be dead and just not know it yet.
CHL Instructor since 1995
http://www.dentoncountysports.com "A Private Palace for Pistol Proficiency"
User avatar
OldCannon
Senior Member
Posts: 3061
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:19 am
Location: Kyle, TX

Re: Trooper engages man, after man starts shooting

Post by OldCannon »

An interesting analysis of the incident:

http://chrishernandezauthor.com/2013/10 ... -shooting/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I don't fear guns; I fear voters and politicians that fear guns.
User avatar
Beiruty
Senior Member
Posts: 9655
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: Allen, Texas

Re: Trooper engages man, after man starts shooting

Post by Beiruty »

OldCannon wrote:An interesting analysis of the incident:

http://chrishernandezauthor.com/2013/10 ... -shooting/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
After Allen took a military stand, and his right had was behind his back, the Cop should started shouting, "show me your hands, show me your hands" and immediately draw his pistol.
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member
Texsquatch
Senior Member
Posts: 576
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 11:55 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: Trooper engages man, after man starts shooting

Post by Texsquatch »

baldeagle wrote:
'He would have never shot at a police official or anyone of the law,' his cousin, Will Wright III, said. 'He would not have missed the kill shot either.'
And yet the video doesn't lie. He did shoot at the trooper, and he did miss the kill shot. Family members so often cannot admit the truth, even when it stares them in the face.
I'm still trying to figure this comment out? Why say that at all? He got out of the car, ready to fight, that was obvious. And with his kids in the car, none the less. Now you have 3 kids who may grow up hating law enforcement because of having to witness their dead father sitting next to them. Which his cousin making that ignorant statement, I'm sure the kids aren't being told the truth. Good thing the trooper & his family that the trooper didn't miss the kill shot. I would even say he waited too long to engage, so the dead guys family can't say a trigger happy cop ruined their family.
Post Reply

Return to “The Crime Blotter”