Apparently Wendy Davis regrets saying she supported second amendment rights, because what she said "wasn't really in keeping" with her actual views. I know we're all shocked that a politician would say something that doesn't line up with her beliefs and values merely in hopes of garnering votes.
I saw that on Twitter earlier this morning. The first thing I thought was that with everything that went wrong in her campaign, THAT's what she regrets?
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
I couldn't help but laugh when I saw this on the news last night. She's proven herself to be a pathological liar many times over, but this is the first time she admitted to a lie. Could she be on the road to recovery?
Charles L. Cotton wrote:I couldn't help but laugh when I saw this on the news last night. She's proven herself to be a pathological liar many times over, but this is the first time she admitted to a lie. Could she be on the road to recovery?
Chas.
She could say that she is...
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
Wendy Davis has said she regrets expressing support for the open carry of handguns in her failed gubernatorial bid.
According to the San Antonio Express-News, Davis says the position "wasn't really in keeping" with her actual view and "strayed" from her core beliefs.
You mean she lied??? I'm shocked I tell you... SHOCKED!!!
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams
Being shocked that Davis, or indeed, any politician, lies to get votes, is much akin to walking into a casino and telling the faro dealer you're shocked, shocked you say!, that there is gambling in the establishment.
JSThane wrote:Being shocked that Davis, or indeed, any politician, lies to get votes, is much akin to walking into a casino and telling the faro dealer you're shocked, shocked you say!, that there is gambling in the establishment.
I hope you realize this thread is full of OBVIOUS sarcasm.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
JSThane wrote:Being shocked that Davis, or indeed, any politician, lies to get votes, is much akin to walking into a casino and telling the faro dealer you're shocked, shocked you say!, that there is gambling in the establishment.
I hope you realize this thread is full of OBVIOUS sarcasm.
I am shocked, shocked I tell you, to find sarcasm in this thread!
What she meant was that she didnt support the 2nd before she said she did support it; and in reality, she wishes to de-support ...er... un-support it once again, but do so retroactively....of course, she reserves the right, based on her prerogatives to maintain flexibility on this issue as it develops.....
“In the world of lies, truth-telling is a hanging offense"
~Unknown
JSThane wrote:Being shocked that Davis, or indeed, any politician, lies to get votes, is much akin to walking into a casino and telling the faro dealer you're shocked, shocked you say!, that there is gambling in the establishment.
I hope you realize this thread is full of OBVIOUS sarcasm.
I am shocked, shocked I tell you, to find sarcasm in this thread!
Thought you would be.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
Jim Beaux wrote:What she meant was that she didnt support the 2nd before she said she did support it; and in reality, she wishes to de-support ...er... un-support it once again, but do so retroactively....of course, she reserves the right, based on her prerogatives to maintain flexibility on this issue as it develops.....
Kind of like the president and his position on gay marriage?
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
Doesn't phase the Socialists at all that this lying tramp has no values. They will continue supporting her because she looks like them, acts like them and has minimum human value, just like them. I was tempted at posting a Wendy Davis Abortion Barbie pic but didn't want to ruin dinner for anyone including myself.
