Glock: Full size vs. Tactical for IDPA/IPSC
Moderator: carlson1
- GlockenHammer
- Senior Member
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 1:17 pm
Glock: Full size vs. Tactical for IDPA/IPSC
I've enjoyed shooting my carry gun (G23 in .40) with full power ammunition in IDPA and IPSC for some time. However, to shoot competitively in the IPSC "Limited 10" category, I'd need the large capacity of the full size (G22) or tactical size (G35) magazine. Since this will be a game gun only (my first so dedicated), I naturally thought the G35 would be the right choice. However, some discussions in another thread have caused me some concern.
So my question to you is regarding the choice between the full size and tactical size Glock models: which do you like better for competition and why?
So my question to you is regarding the choice between the full size and tactical size Glock models: which do you like better for competition and why?
- HighVelocity
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3374
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:54 pm
- Location: DFW, TX
- Contact:
Go with the 35 for limited 10. That extra little bit of sight radius can make the difference between an A and a Mike.
I've seen IPSC/USPSA COF's with 85yd shots!
Stage 13 http://www.bulletworks.com/images/Tx-Li ... s-2006.pdf
I've seen IPSC/USPSA COF's with 85yd shots!

Stage 13 http://www.bulletworks.com/images/Tx-Li ... s-2006.pdf
I am scared of empty guns and keep mine loaded at all times. The family knows the guns are loaded and treats them with respect. Loaded guns cause few accidents; empty guns kill people every year. -Elmer Keith. 1961
- jbirds1210
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3368
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 5:36 pm
- Location: Texas City, Texas
I would likely rethink my decision for a Glock 17 if I had to make 85 yard shots. Thank goodness that IDPA does not have those! I completely agre that the extra sight radius would be appreciated at that distance. At least I could say I was doing all I could do!HighVelocity wrote:Go with the 35 for limited 10. That extra little bit of sight radius can make the difference between an A and a Mike.
I've seen IPSC/USPSA COF's with 85yd shots!![]()
Stage 13 http://www.bulletworks.com/images/Tx-Li ... s-2006.pdf
NRA Life Member
TSRA Life Member
"No man stands so tall as when he stoops to help a child."
TSRA Life Member
"No man stands so tall as when he stoops to help a child."
I'm just an interested spectator, so have no basis from which to vote.
But HV's note made me wonder if there is an official maximum target distance in IDPA. I gave a quick glance at Appendix Five of the Rule Book, and found only "...most target distances being 15 yards or less," and "...targets in excess of 15 yards can be allowed on occasion to test shooting skill." Offhand (no pun intended), I can't remember ever hearing of an IDPA CoF having a target at greater than 35 yards (I know Stage 8 at last year's Nationals had three targets at 35 yards, and partially obscured by barrels).
Not to give GH any nefarious ideas, but does anybody know if there is an actual maximum in IDPA? Or is it solely up to the MD?
But HV's note made me wonder if there is an official maximum target distance in IDPA. I gave a quick glance at Appendix Five of the Rule Book, and found only "...most target distances being 15 yards or less," and "...targets in excess of 15 yards can be allowed on occasion to test shooting skill." Offhand (no pun intended), I can't remember ever hearing of an IDPA CoF having a target at greater than 35 yards (I know Stage 8 at last year's Nationals had three targets at 35 yards, and partially obscured by barrels).
Not to give GH any nefarious ideas, but does anybody know if there is an actual maximum in IDPA? Or is it solely up to the MD?
Join the NRA or upgrade your membership today. Support the Texas Firearms Coalition and subscribe to the Podcast.
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member
- jbirds1210
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3368
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 5:36 pm
- Location: Texas City, Texas
The maximum distance in IDPA is 35 yards.Skiprr wrote:But HV's note made me wonder if there is an official maximum target distance in IDPA. Snip....
From the rule book:
CoF 2. Seventy-five percent of all shots required in a match
must be fifteen (15) yards or less. Occasional targets out to
thirty-five (35) yards are to be encouraged.
NRA Life Member
TSRA Life Member
"No man stands so tall as when he stoops to help a child."
TSRA Life Member
"No man stands so tall as when he stoops to help a child."
- HighVelocity
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3374
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:54 pm
- Location: DFW, TX
- Contact:
I have stuff hanging from my wall won at both USPSA (IPSC) & IDPA matches - all shot with a G35. You can't go wrong w/a G35. The added benefit from going w/a .40 for IDPA is that you can load so that it feels softer than a 9mm & turn around the next week & shoot major w/it in USPSA!
Good luck!
Good luck!
Dr. Kyle
Yeppers. Jason added, "Thank goodness that IDPA does not have those!" (meaning 85-yard pistol shots). So I was just wondering if there were a definitive IDPA maximum.HighVelocity wrote:Yep, 35 yards max in IDPA but GH was talking about IPSC.
DrKyle1 is keepin' me on topic, and if Longtooth isn't watchin', I'll confess my interest is because I'm thinkin' about picking something up I can shoot SSP with. Don't have much in my limited collection that would be useful in SSP...a 15-yard target with my G27 would feel like 35 with a 1911. So I'm in the market, myself.
Join the NRA or upgrade your membership today. Support the Texas Firearms Coalition and subscribe to the Podcast.
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member
- GlockenHammer
- Senior Member
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 1:17 pm