Help!
Crash

Pawpaw,Pawpaw wrote:Apparently there was an older model that was made that way.
http://www.taurususa.com/product-detail ... umbseries=
Funny--I called Taurus and their rep claimed not to know anything about a previous model. I suspect he didn't know much about any of the models, past or present--he was just a "phone-answerer."Pawpaw wrote:Sorry, I don't know anything about Taurus firearms. I just put my Google-fu to work.
Pawpaw wrote:Dunno. I just went to the Taurus USA website, typed "709" into the search box and there it was.
Waco1959,Waco1959 wrote:I looked at the photo on Bass Pro and I wonder if this is a fake or a prototype photo. I have a 709 and I've seen a bunch and none have had a cutout on the grip or white filled lettering and mine from several years ago is identical to what is shown on the Taurus website.
What it DOES look like is a PT738 with 709 written on it and a ambi safety added. I think the Bass Pro marketing people were playing with Photoshop and got carried away.
709 was my first pistol. It would double feed like it was going out of style. Started out as a good shooter for probably the first 500 rounds or so. Made two round trips to Taurus to be "fixed" and after that it went on the sale block. It would malfunction on 1-2 rounds per 7 round mag. Multiple mags showed the same problems, which was annoying considering how much and how long it took to get a second mag.surprise_i'm_armed wrote:Although a Taurus PT709 may not be the first pistol on everyone's "gotta have it"
list, IIRC, the PT709 was subjected to a very high round count of testing and
performed for many thousands of rounds without failure.
I don't know if it was Taurus, or an outside entity who conducted this stress test.
If anyone can post that link, go for it.
SIA