txinvestigator wrote:No way.evil_smurf wrote:Okay, thank you for clearing that up.
Like I mentioned above in my earlier post I came to the same conclusion you did, that intentional verbal disclosure is probably prohibited.
Texas Government Code
Text
§411.171. Definitions.
In this subchapter:
(3) "Concealed handgun" means a handgun, the presence of
which is not openly discernible to the ordinary observation of a
reasonable person.
If I go to Kroger and see my buddy and he asked if I am carrying and I reply yes, I did not intentionally fail to conceal it. This seems real simple to me.
Course I am kinda simple minded.
My point of view (equally simple minded) , is that you are correct.
I can't help but think the wording used in §411.171. was intended to imply a "physical" concealment. Otherwise, every time LE asked for your DL (while carrying) and you (also) produced your CHL, you would technically be in violation.
Similarly, any circumstance that allowed your CHL to be viewed by another.. could reasonably cause an apprehension that you were carrying even if you didn't verbally say so. Surely, this is not the spirit in which the law was written.
A person may SAY anything. Whether or not you have any reason to believe them...is largely a matter of circumstance, empirical evidence, and that persons integrity (if it be known). How could all this be judged quickly in the field?
Until I see convincing argument to the contrary, I'm going with physical concealment as the true intent of the law.
Just my .02 (and you know how I hate to agree with TXI).