Constitution "Grows with the times"

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
TxD
Senior Member
Posts: 690
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 2:29 pm
Location: Friendswood Tx

Constitution "Grows with the times"

Post by TxD »

Oh Boy, here we go.
Frontrunner for Supreme Court Believes Constitution Grows 'With the Times'
Image
http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/a ... rcID=47604" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

(CNSNews.com) – Judge Diane Wood, reported to be on President Obama’s short list of possible nominees to replace Justice David Souter on the Supreme Court, believes a judge's interpretation of what the Constitution means must "grow with the times."

"Wood has been a federal judge in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit in Chicago since President Clinton appointed her to the position in 1995. The court handles federal case appeals for the district court of Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin."

"President Obama has long-standing ties to Wood. For 12 years, Wood and Obama were colleagues on the faculty of the University of Chicago Law School. Obama left the law school in 2004. Wood is still a senior lecturer there."
Black Rifles Matter
User avatar
roberts
Banned
Posts: 293
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 2:24 pm

Re: Constitution "Grows with the times"

Post by roberts »

Like a cancer.
THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS NOT ABOUT DUCK HUNTING
User avatar
74novaman
Senior Member
Posts: 3798
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:36 am
Location: CenTex

Re: Constitution "Grows with the times"

Post by 74novaman »

If she wants to legislate, she should run for Congress.

:???:
TANSTAAFL
bpet
Senior Member
Posts: 569
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 5:03 pm
Location: Rowlett, Tx

Re: Constitution "Grows with the times"

Post by bpet »

I guess the process of changing the Constitution is too complex for some people including federal judges. The process has worked well up to now.

Too bad some simply cant understand that if you can't get what you want following the rules, and you can't get the rules changed, you shouldn't assume that you can ignore the rules. Arrogance has always been a strong suit for these people and I don't care a lot for arrogance.

I'm having lots of problems with the current administration and I don't see things improving much in the future. :mad5
"Limit politicians to two terms. One in office and one in jail!" (Borrowed from an anonymous donor)
casingpoint
Senior Member
Posts: 1447
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm

Re: Constitution "Grows with the times"

Post by casingpoint »

Back in the day, I know what she would have been good at, constitutional or not... :thumbs2:
User avatar
jimlongley
Senior Member
Posts: 6134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Allen, TX

Re: Constitution "Grows with the times"

Post by jimlongley »

Another Chicago politician.
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365
User avatar
bryang
Senior Member
Posts: 1453
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:29 am
Location: Ft. Worth/Dallas

Re: Constitution "Grows with the times"

Post by bryang »

Good grief! just when you thought it couldn't get any worse.....

And it has only been 100 days!! Lord help us.

-geo
"I am crucified with Christ: Nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me" -Gal 2:20

NRA-TSRA-Life Member
American Legion USN-GM
"Μολών λαβέ!"

Project One Million:Texas - Get Involved - Join The NRA & TSRA -TODAY!
casingpoint
Senior Member
Posts: 1447
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm

Re: Constitution "Grows with the times"

Post by casingpoint »

Why don't we just turn the administration of the country over to the University of Chicago and forget about it and Obama.
User avatar
Skiprr
Moderator
Posts: 6458
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:50 pm
Location: Outskirts of Houston

Re: Constitution "Grows with the times"

Post by Skiprr »

CNSNews.com wrote:Judge Diane Wood, reported to be on President Obama’s short list of possible nominees to replace Justice David Souter on the Supreme Court, believes a judge's interpretation of what the Constitution means must "grow with the times."
Oh, let's just change a few words here and there to make the Constitution sound more "contemporary." That way, current-generation Americans will think the old document is still relevant. It should be easier to read, shouldn't it? We're a generation used to PowerPoint slides, so maybe things would be clearer if we did bullet-points instead of that archaic language. Besides, in the current era, things can't be stated in black-and-white terms like they were 230 years ago, in far simpler times. For example:
Old Version wrote:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
And the Judge Diane Wood recommended rewrite:
New Version wrote:We won't make any laws--other than those that may be reasonable and necessary--that:
  • Prevent you from starting your own religion or practicing any religion you choose, so long as that religion's practices don't contradict existing laws or regulations
  • Control what you say or write, provided that what you say or write doesn't interfere with the best interests of the Country;
  • Keep you from peaceably assembling as a group, as long as you obtain the correct licenses and/or administrative approvals;
  • Prevent you from asking the Government for help with instances of laws you think were applied incorrectly.
Now, isn't that a lot clearer?

:banghead:
Join the NRA or upgrade your membership today. Support the Texas Firearms Coalition and subscribe to the Podcast.
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member
User avatar
boomerang
Senior Member
Posts: 2629
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:06 pm
Contact:

Re: Constitution "Grows with the times"

Post by boomerang »

Skiprr wrote:
New Version wrote:We won't make any laws--other than those that may be reasonable and necessary--that:
  • Prevent you from starting your own religion or practicing any religion you choose, so long as that religion's practices don't contradict existing laws or regulations
Now, isn't that a lot clearer?

:banghead:
You forgot the part where they reserve the right to trump up charges if they don't like your religion or politics. cf. Vernon Howell
"Ees gun! Ees not safe!"
45 4 life
Member
Posts: 193
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:09 pm
Location: Irving, TX

Re: Constitution "Grows with the times"

Post by 45 4 life »

Every time I ask myself if it can get any worse, it does. I am going to quit asking!
How many days of this do we have left anyway?
Don't Confuse the Issues With the Facts
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”