CNSNews.com wrote:Judge Diane Wood, reported to be on President Obama’s short list of possible nominees to replace Justice David Souter on the Supreme Court, believes a judge's interpretation of what the Constitution means must "grow with the times."
Oh, let's just change a few words here and there to make the Constitution sound more "contemporary." That way, current-generation Americans will think the old document is still relevant. It should be easier to read, shouldn't it? We're a generation used to PowerPoint slides, so maybe things would be clearer if we did bullet-points instead of that archaic language. Besides, in the current era, things can't be stated in black-and-white terms like they were 230 years ago, in far simpler times. For example:
Old Version wrote:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
And the Judge Diane Wood recommended rewrite:
New Version wrote:We won't make any laws--other than those that may be reasonable and necessary--that:
- Prevent you from starting your own religion or practicing any religion you choose, so long as that religion's practices don't contradict existing laws or regulations
- Control what you say or write, provided that what you say or write doesn't interfere with the best interests of the Country;
- Keep you from peaceably assembling as a group, as long as you obtain the correct licenses and/or administrative approvals;
- Prevent you from asking the Government for help with instances of laws you think were applied incorrectly.
Now, isn't that a lot clearer?

Join the NRA or upgrade your membership today. Support the
Texas Firearms Coalition and subscribe to the Podcast.
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring
HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member