HB 3318 Infanticide Bill - Please Protect the Children

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar
Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: HB 3318 Infanticide Bill - Please Protect the Children

Post by Oldgringo »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
HB3318 wrote:(e)At the punishment stage of a trial in which a defendant
has been found guilty of causing the death of a child to whom the
defendant gave birth within the 12-month period preceding the
child ’s death, the defendant may raise the issue as to whether the
defendant caused the child ’s death because the defendant ’s judgment
was impaired as a result of the effects of giving birth
or the
effects of lactation following the birth. If the defendant proves
the issue in the affirmative by a preponderance of the evidence, the
offense is a state jail felony.
So you have to meet the standard of insanity to be found "not guilty by reason of insanity," but merely having your judgment "impaired" is sufficient to reduce the classification of murdering an infant from capitol murder (death penalty or life in prison) to a state jail felony (6 months to two years in jail).

Jessica Farrar,the bill's primary author, is also the woman who filed HB1395 that would make legal hunting a defense to prosecution, meaning every hunter could be arrested and prosecuted and they would have to hire an attorney to prove the defense of lawful hunting. So she would have lawful hunters to jail for killing a dove, but only have a murdering mother spend 6 months to two years in jail.

Chas.
Who is this woman and how did she get elected in Texas - of all places? The problem is not Jessica Farrar, the problem is her constituency and her supporters/followers in the legislature. It's not illegal to be a whacko, but the voters should know better than elect whackos to speak for them unless, of course...er, uh, well, you know, the voters themselves are whackos.

BTW, my little rant has nothing to do with freedom of choice.
Dave01
Member
Posts: 130
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 4:06 pm
Location: Rockwall, TX

Re: HB 3318 Infanticide Bill - Please Protect the Children

Post by Dave01 »

nitrogen wrote:I'm guessing this has something to do with Abortion, but I fail to see what.

Even though I support the right to choose (yeah, I know, lemme have it) this makes no sense and I will make a call, along with all the pro gun stuff I will call about
I don't think this is about abortion. It appears to be worded specifically to reduce the sentence of women who suffer from postpartum depression/psychosis and murder their child as a result. This would only apply in a very specific circumstance; not to anyone/everyone who murders a child.

I agree with Charles though. There is already a standard for "insanity" which should be applied in these cases.

Dave
User avatar
nitrogen
Senior Member
Posts: 2322
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 1:15 pm
Location: Sachse, TX
Contact:

Re: HB 3318 Infanticide Bill - Please Protect the Children

Post by nitrogen »

Ok, that makes sense.

It's still insane.
.השואה... לעולם לא עוד
Holocaust... Never Again.
Some people create their own storms and get upset when it rains.
--anonymous
User avatar
barres
Senior Member
Posts: 1118
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Prison City, Texas

Re: HB 3318 Infanticide Bill - Please Protect the Children

Post by barres »

nitrogen wrote:Ok, that makes sense.

It's still insane.
It makes sense but it's insane. :rolll :smilelol5:

I guess I can see where this is coming from, but I think it makes no sense, whatsoever. If the mother is insane (due to post-partum depression or whatever) then she'll be found not guilty by reason of insanity. If she is/was not insane, then she knew that what she was doing was wrong, and she should face the full penalty for her illegal actions!
Remember, in a life-or-death situation, when seconds count, the police are only minutes away.

Barre
WarHawk-AVG
Senior Member
Posts: 1403
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 11:05 pm

Re: HB 3318 Infanticide Bill - Please Protect the Children

Post by WarHawk-AVG »

lunchbox wrote::confused5 why is this even being considered :banghead:
Because the libtards have messed up their states of origin so much that they are going bankrupt and they are jumping ship like rats..they are coming here and are attempting to mess up our state as well!
A sheepdog says "I will lead the way. I will set the highest standards. ...Your mission is to man the ramparts in this dark and desperate hour with honor and courage." - Lt. Col. Grossman
‘All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing’ - Edmond Burke
User avatar
Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts: 17788
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: HB 3318 Infanticide Bill - Please Protect the Children

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

lunchbox wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:
roberts wrote:
lunchbox wrote::confused5 why is this even being considered :banghead:
Why is it being discussed? I thought politics discussions aren't allowed unless it's about guns.
I'll let you know when I want you to join the Moderator Corps. Until then, don't call us, we'll call you.

Chas.

I didnt mean on this forum i meant in the state legislature :banghead:
My comment wasn't directed at your post. Sorry if it appeared that way.

Chas.
lunchbox
Senior Member
Posts: 1266
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:04 pm
Location: San Angelo

Re: HB 3318 Infanticide Bill - Please Protect the Children

Post by lunchbox »

how do libtards get elected to our state gov when they came from another state that should be illegal
"I have two guns. One for each of ya" Doc Holiday
"Out here, due process is a bullet."
"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like somebody just walked over your grave."
"forgiveness is between them and god its my job to arrange the meeting" man on fire
User avatar
Captain Matt
Senior Member
Posts: 507
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 1:43 pm
Location: blue water

Re: HB 3318 Infanticide Bill - Please Protect the Children

Post by Captain Matt »

TheArmedFarmer wrote:I'm still outraged about this.

Another thought occurred to me: do we not all have a right to equal protection under the law? How does it make sense to lessen (or increase) the offense against someone based on the age of the victim?
Then they should delete #8 from 19.03 in the penal code.

To give all victims a right to equal protection under the law, they also should delete #1 and #9. Maybe other special cases too.
"hic sunt dracones"
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”