I was the foreman on a jury that tried a DUI case. We had the definition of DUI drilled into us. "The loss of the normal use of the faculties due to the introduction of alcohol into the bloodstream." As long as you can function normally, you would not meet these definition. Mind you, I don't know if the state defines chemical intoxication the same way. You might want to check the Texas penal laws to see.03Lightningrocks wrote:I agree....but... as with many things in life... I have had a personal experience that has been enlightening. I bet others here can say the same. A couple months back, I damaged a nerve in my neck that caused excruciating pain. I have been on a combination of 10mg valium, 300mg gabapentin, 10/500 hydrocodone four times a day now for about 9 weeks. Now this combination would have knocked me on my rear end and made me unable to function three months back. But No.... thanks to the miracles of the human body, I am now functioning like I have no drugs in my system at all. I don't feel any "intoxication" what so ever from these meds at this point. I have known others who are on an even stronger combination of pain meds and function as well as your minister on Sunday morning.
I said all this because I have wondered a few times how this works. No cop or anyone else would ever know I am on these meds unless I told them I was. So.... am I intoxicated? This post isn't meant to be a challenge... please... i don't need judgemental posts at the moment. i am hoping for an answer I can hang my hat on.
By the way... surgery in the next few weeks will result in three to six months on pain killers. Where does a feller or gal :0) stand in this situation? After all... I am not intoxicated technically.
CHL Rule Changes
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Re: CHL Rule Changes
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
-
- Member
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: CHL Rule Changes
IANAL…As I read the penal code, the only intoxication offense that you could get out of for being on prescribed medications is "Public Intoxication". However, you can still be arrested and wind up having to defend yourself in court.
Sec. 49.01. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:
(1) "Alcohol concentration" means the number of grams of alcohol per:
(A) 210 liters of breath;
(B) 100 milliliters of blood; or
(C) 67 milliliters of urine.
(2) "Intoxicated" means:
(A) not having the normal use of mental or physical faculties by reason of the introduction of alcohol, a controlled substance, a drug, a dangerous drug, a combination of two or more of those substances, or any other substance into the body; or
(B) having an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more.
Sec. 49.02. PUBLIC INTOXICATION. (a) A person commits an offense if the person appears in a public place while intoxicated to the degree that the person may endanger the person or another.
(a-1) For the purposes of this section, a premises licensed or permitted under the Alcoholic Beverage Code is a public place.
(b) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the alcohol or other substance was administered for therapeutic purposes and as a part of the person's professional medical treatment by a licensed physician.
Help support the Second Amendment by joining the NRA! We would not have a CHL program without them!
Southeast Texas CHL
Concealed Handgun Classes in League City
http://www.setxchl.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Southeast Texas CHL
Concealed Handgun Classes in League City
http://www.setxchl.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Oldgringo
- Senior Member
- Posts: 11203
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
- Location: Pineywoods of east Texas
Re: CHL Rule Changes
Gentlepersons, the above statement pretty much says it all......you can still be arrested and wind up having to defend yourself in court...
- Charles L. Cotton
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17788
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
Re: CHL Rule Changes
There has been no change in the size requirements for a 30.06 sign. The 1" block letter requirement, as well as the requirement that the sign be in both English and Spanish, are in the code and can be changed only by the Legislature.
The only recent change regarding signs was the creation of a defense to prosecution for entering a 51% location. Previously, the lack of a 51% sign was not a defense to prosecution, but now it is. Perhaps this caused some confusion.
Chas.
The only recent change regarding signs was the creation of a defense to prosecution for entering a 51% location. Previously, the lack of a 51% sign was not a defense to prosecution, but now it is. Perhaps this caused some confusion.
Chas.
Re: CHL Rule Changes
You're dating yourself.Oldgringo wrote:Well, just color me.
As Rosanne Rosanadana would say, "nevermind".

Husband and wife CHL team since 2009
- Oldgringo
- Senior Member
- Posts: 11203
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
- Location: Pineywoods of east Texas
Re: CHL Rule Changes
Thank you. Actually, if all of the other requirments; i.e. wording, languages, contrasting colors and conspicuous placement are there, I pretty much consider that the Owner's intentions are clear.Charles L. Cotton wrote:There has been no change in the size requirements for a 30.06 sign. The 1" block letter requirement, as well as the requirement that the sign be in both English and Spanish, are in the code and can be changed only by the Legislature.
The only recent change regarding signs was the creation of a defense to prosecution for entering a 51% location. Previously, the lack of a 51% sign was not a defense to prosecution, but now it is. Perhaps this caused some confusion.
Chas.
Re: CHL Rule Changes
I didn't drink very often before, but since I got my CHL, if I'm packin I ain't drinkin. For me the easiest place to cut it off is "0".
- Cobra Medic
- Senior Member
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 6:53 pm
Re: CHL Rule Changes
It's also good advice for people asking if "printing" is illegal.Oldgringo wrote:Gentlepersons, the above statement pretty much says it all......you can still be arrested and wind up having to defend yourself in court...
This will only hurt a little. What comes next, more so.
- Charles L. Cotton
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17788
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
Re: CHL Rule Changes
Correct, but a person cannot be prosecuted based upon a person's intent; the statutory elements of the crime must be present. If the sign does not meet all of the statutory requirements, the elements of the crime aren't present. Close doesn't count when dealing with TPC §30.06.Oldgringo wrote:Thank you. Actually, if all of the other requirments; i.e. wording, languages, contrasting colors and conspicuous placement are there, I pretty much consider that the Owner's intentions are clear.Charles L. Cotton wrote:There has been no change in the size requirements for a 30.06 sign. The 1" block letter requirement, as well as the requirement that the sign be in both English and Spanish, are in the code and can be changed only by the Legislature.
The only recent change regarding signs was the creation of a defense to prosecution for entering a 51% location. Previously, the lack of a 51% sign was not a defense to prosecution, but now it is. Perhaps this caused some confusion.
Chas.
Chas.
Re: CHL Rule Changes
So, we can't be prosecuted for PI while under a doctor's care, but couldn't we still be had for unlawfully carry a weapon while under the influence? I mean, if there is no "limit" for us, but rather the officer's opinion, couldn't we still be in trouble? Also, I think it's that (2)(A) "normal use of mental or physical faculties" part that would get us into trouble.
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
- jester
- Senior Member
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 8:52 pm
- Location: Energy Capital of the World
Re: CHL Rule Changes
Intoxicated is intoxicated. Same as driving. If your meds make you unsafe to drive, don't get behind the wheel. If you're unsafe to carry, don't do that either.C-dub wrote:So, we can't be prosecuted for PI while under a doctor's care, but couldn't we still be had for unlawfully carry a weapon while under the influence? I mean, if there is no "limit" for us, but rather the officer's opinion, couldn't we still be in trouble? Also, I think it's that (2)(A) "normal use of mental or physical faculties" part that would get us into trouble.
"There is but one correct answer...and it is best delivered with a Winchester rifle."
- 03Lightningrocks
- Senior Member
- Posts: 11460
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:15 pm
- Location: Plano
Re: CHL Rule Changes
LOL... if they do change the rules to allow letters under an inch, some folks would be in trouble because they may be able to see well enough to get around but not be able to see well enough to read letters less than one inch tall.Oldgringo wrote:Thank you. Actually, if all of the other requirments; i.e. wording, languages, contrasting colors and conspicuous placement are there, I pretty much consider that the Owner's intentions are clear.Charles L. Cotton wrote:There has been no change in the size requirements for a 30.06 sign. The 1" block letter requirement, as well as the requirement that the sign be in both English and Spanish, are in the code and can be changed only by the Legislature.
The only recent change regarding signs was the creation of a defense to prosecution for entering a 51% location. Previously, the lack of a 51% sign was not a defense to prosecution, but now it is. Perhaps this caused some confusion.
Chas.
NRA-Endowment Member
http://www.planoair.com
http://www.planoairconditioningandheating.com
http://www.planoair.com
http://www.planoairconditioningandheating.com
Re: CHL Rule Changes
Yup.jester wrote:Intoxicated is intoxicated. Same as driving. If your meds make you unsafe to drive, don't get behind the wheel. If you're unsafe to carry, don't do that either.C-dub wrote:So, we can't be prosecuted for PI while under a doctor's care, but couldn't we still be had for unlawfully carry a weapon while under the influence? I mean, if there is no "limit" for us, but rather the officer's opinion, couldn't we still be in trouble? Also, I think it's that (2)(A) "normal use of mental or physical faculties" part that would get us into trouble.
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider