CHL Rule Changes

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar
baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: CHL Rule Changes

Post by baldeagle »

03Lightningrocks wrote:I agree....but... as with many things in life... I have had a personal experience that has been enlightening. I bet others here can say the same. A couple months back, I damaged a nerve in my neck that caused excruciating pain. I have been on a combination of 10mg valium, 300mg gabapentin, 10/500 hydrocodone four times a day now for about 9 weeks. Now this combination would have knocked me on my rear end and made me unable to function three months back. But No.... thanks to the miracles of the human body, I am now functioning like I have no drugs in my system at all. I don't feel any "intoxication" what so ever from these meds at this point. I have known others who are on an even stronger combination of pain meds and function as well as your minister on Sunday morning.

I said all this because I have wondered a few times how this works. No cop or anyone else would ever know I am on these meds unless I told them I was. So.... am I intoxicated? This post isn't meant to be a challenge... please... i don't need judgemental posts at the moment. i am hoping for an answer I can hang my hat on.

By the way... surgery in the next few weeks will result in three to six months on pain killers. Where does a feller or gal :0) stand in this situation? After all... I am not intoxicated technically.
I was the foreman on a jury that tried a DUI case. We had the definition of DUI drilled into us. "The loss of the normal use of the faculties due to the introduction of alcohol into the bloodstream." As long as you can function normally, you would not meet these definition. Mind you, I don't know if the state defines chemical intoxication the same way. You might want to check the Texas penal laws to see.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
Justin Franklin
Member
Posts: 152
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:23 pm
Contact:

Re: CHL Rule Changes

Post by Justin Franklin »

IANAL…As I read the penal code, the only intoxication offense that you could get out of for being on prescribed medications is "Public Intoxication". However, you can still be arrested and wind up having to defend yourself in court.
Sec. 49.01. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:
(1) "Alcohol concentration" means the number of grams of alcohol per:
(A) 210 liters of breath;
(B) 100 milliliters of blood; or
(C) 67 milliliters of urine.
(2) "Intoxicated" means:
(A) not having the normal use of mental or physical faculties by reason of the introduction of alcohol, a controlled substance, a drug, a dangerous drug, a combination of two or more of those substances, or any other substance into the body; or
(B) having an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more.

Sec. 49.02. PUBLIC INTOXICATION. (a) A person commits an offense if the person appears in a public place while intoxicated to the degree that the person may endanger the person or another.
(a-1) For the purposes of this section, a premises licensed or permitted under the Alcoholic Beverage Code is a public place.
(b) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the alcohol or other substance was administered for therapeutic purposes and as a part of the person's professional medical treatment by a licensed physician.
Help support the Second Amendment by joining the NRA! We would not have a CHL program without them!

Southeast Texas CHL
Concealed Handgun Classes in League City
http://www.setxchl.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: CHL Rule Changes

Post by Oldgringo »

...you can still be arrested and wind up having to defend yourself in court...
Gentlepersons, the above statement pretty much says it all...
User avatar
Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts: 17788
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: CHL Rule Changes

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

There has been no change in the size requirements for a 30.06 sign. The 1" block letter requirement, as well as the requirement that the sign be in both English and Spanish, are in the code and can be changed only by the Legislature.

The only recent change regarding signs was the creation of a defense to prosecution for entering a 51% location. Previously, the lack of a 51% sign was not a defense to prosecution, but now it is. Perhaps this caused some confusion.

Chas.
User avatar
Embalmo
Senior Member
Posts: 943
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:16 am
Location: Pflugerville

Re: CHL Rule Changes

Post by Embalmo »

Oldgringo wrote:Well, just color me :oops: .

As Rosanne Rosanadana would say, "nevermind".
You're dating yourself. :biggrinjester:
Husband and wife CHL team since 2009
User avatar
Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: CHL Rule Changes

Post by Oldgringo »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:There has been no change in the size requirements for a 30.06 sign. The 1" block letter requirement, as well as the requirement that the sign be in both English and Spanish, are in the code and can be changed only by the Legislature.

The only recent change regarding signs was the creation of a defense to prosecution for entering a 51% location. Previously, the lack of a 51% sign was not a defense to prosecution, but now it is. Perhaps this caused some confusion.

Chas.
Thank you. Actually, if all of the other requirments; i.e. wording, languages, contrasting colors and conspicuous placement are there, I pretty much consider that the Owner's intentions are clear.
glbedd53
Senior Member
Posts: 929
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:05 pm

Re: CHL Rule Changes

Post by glbedd53 »

I didn't drink very often before, but since I got my CHL, if I'm packin I ain't drinkin. For me the easiest place to cut it off is "0".
User avatar
Cobra Medic
Senior Member
Posts: 415
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 6:53 pm

Re: CHL Rule Changes

Post by Cobra Medic »

Oldgringo wrote:
...you can still be arrested and wind up having to defend yourself in court...
Gentlepersons, the above statement pretty much says it all...
It's also good advice for people asking if "printing" is illegal.
This will only hurt a little. What comes next, more so.
User avatar
Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts: 17788
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: CHL Rule Changes

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

Oldgringo wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:There has been no change in the size requirements for a 30.06 sign. The 1" block letter requirement, as well as the requirement that the sign be in both English and Spanish, are in the code and can be changed only by the Legislature.

The only recent change regarding signs was the creation of a defense to prosecution for entering a 51% location. Previously, the lack of a 51% sign was not a defense to prosecution, but now it is. Perhaps this caused some confusion.

Chas.
Thank you. Actually, if all of the other requirments; i.e. wording, languages, contrasting colors and conspicuous placement are there, I pretty much consider that the Owner's intentions are clear.
Correct, but a person cannot be prosecuted based upon a person's intent; the statutory elements of the crime must be present. If the sign does not meet all of the statutory requirements, the elements of the crime aren't present. Close doesn't count when dealing with TPC §30.06.

Chas.
User avatar
C-dub
Senior Member
Posts: 13584
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: CHL Rule Changes

Post by C-dub »

So, we can't be prosecuted for PI while under a doctor's care, but couldn't we still be had for unlawfully carry a weapon while under the influence? I mean, if there is no "limit" for us, but rather the officer's opinion, couldn't we still be in trouble? Also, I think it's that (2)(A) "normal use of mental or physical faculties" part that would get us into trouble.
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
User avatar
jester
Senior Member
Posts: 505
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 8:52 pm
Location: Energy Capital of the World

Re: CHL Rule Changes

Post by jester »

C-dub wrote:So, we can't be prosecuted for PI while under a doctor's care, but couldn't we still be had for unlawfully carry a weapon while under the influence? I mean, if there is no "limit" for us, but rather the officer's opinion, couldn't we still be in trouble? Also, I think it's that (2)(A) "normal use of mental or physical faculties" part that would get us into trouble.
Intoxicated is intoxicated. Same as driving. If your meds make you unsafe to drive, don't get behind the wheel. If you're unsafe to carry, don't do that either.
"There is but one correct answer...and it is best delivered with a Winchester rifle."
User avatar
03Lightningrocks
Senior Member
Posts: 11460
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Plano

Re: CHL Rule Changes

Post by 03Lightningrocks »

Oldgringo wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:There has been no change in the size requirements for a 30.06 sign. The 1" block letter requirement, as well as the requirement that the sign be in both English and Spanish, are in the code and can be changed only by the Legislature.

The only recent change regarding signs was the creation of a defense to prosecution for entering a 51% location. Previously, the lack of a 51% sign was not a defense to prosecution, but now it is. Perhaps this caused some confusion.

Chas.
Thank you. Actually, if all of the other requirments; i.e. wording, languages, contrasting colors and conspicuous placement are there, I pretty much consider that the Owner's intentions are clear.
LOL... if they do change the rules to allow letters under an inch, some folks would be in trouble because they may be able to see well enough to get around but not be able to see well enough to read letters less than one inch tall.
User avatar
C-dub
Senior Member
Posts: 13584
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: CHL Rule Changes

Post by C-dub »

jester wrote:
C-dub wrote:So, we can't be prosecuted for PI while under a doctor's care, but couldn't we still be had for unlawfully carry a weapon while under the influence? I mean, if there is no "limit" for us, but rather the officer's opinion, couldn't we still be in trouble? Also, I think it's that (2)(A) "normal use of mental or physical faculties" part that would get us into trouble.
Intoxicated is intoxicated. Same as driving. If your meds make you unsafe to drive, don't get behind the wheel. If you're unsafe to carry, don't do that either.
Yup.
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”