ANOTHER 51% SIGN QUESTION

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar
Scott in Houston
Senior Member
Posts: 1560
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:19 am
Location: Houston

Re: ANOTHER 51% SIGN QUESTION

Post by Scott in Houston »

cbr600 wrote:
G192627 wrote:No you don't have to post for them, but you're missing the point. You can still get arrested and charged if they fail to post, and the fact that the business didn't follow the law will likely not help you.
People are arrested and charged with crimes they didn't commit. It happens. I don't dispute that.

However, I'm curious about your comment that a defense to prosecution will likely not help. On what do you base that legal advice? It could be very important to anyone in Texas who has a NFA registered firearm.

"It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the actor's possession was pursuant to registration pursuant to the National Firearms Act, as amended." (TPC 46.05)
I didn't make that argument above, but from experience, having a defense to prosecution does two things:

1) It helps but doesn't guarantee you will be found innocent
2) You're STILL being prosecuted! Not where I want to be innocent or not.
User avatar
ScottDLS
Senior Member
Posts: 5095
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
Location: DFW Area, TX

Re: ANOTHER 51% SIGN QUESTION

Post by ScottDLS »

G192627 wrote:
cbr600 wrote:
G192627 wrote:No you don't have to post for them, but you're missing the point. You can still get arrested and charged if they fail to post, and the fact that the business didn't follow the law will likely not help you.
People are arrested and charged with crimes they didn't commit. It happens. I don't dispute that.

However, I'm curious about your comment that a defense to prosecution will likely not help. On what do you base that legal advice? It could be very important to anyone in Texas who has a NFA registered firearm.

"It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the actor's possession was pursuant to registration pursuant to the National Firearms Act, as amended." (TPC 46.05)
I didn't make that argument above, but from experience, having a defense to prosecution does two things:

1) It helps but doesn't guarantee you will be found innocent
2) You're STILL being prosecuted! Not where I want to be innocent or not.
Mr. Cotton has stated previously that by case law, all the 46.15 exemptions (like carrying with a CHL and carry by a Peace Officer) are "Defenses", not "Exceptions", so this is technically true about your carrying at all w/ your CHL.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”