Hope and Change for Illinois?

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
Rex B
Senior Member
Posts: 3616
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: DFW

Hope and Change for Illinois?

Post by Rex B »

In Pike County, Illinois, Dan Mefford, a chiropractor from Pittsfield, has begun a movement to get a constitutional carry referendum on the election ballot for March of 2012. If successful, such a ballot referendum, “could lead to the state being forced to recognize this right as well, and to expand it to include the rest of Illinois,”

http://www.gundigest.com/news/pike-coun ... =232498968" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;




(edited to correct unfortunate title typo)
Last edited by Rex B on Thu Sep 01, 2011 4:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-----------
“Sometimes there is no alternative to uncertainty except to await the arrival of more and better data.” C. Wunsch
fishman
Senior Member
Posts: 470
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 4:05 pm
Location: Tomball area

Re: Hoe and Change for Illinois?

Post by fishman »

Good for Dan, and the state of Illnois.
IANAL
User avatar
Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Hoe and Change for Illinois?

Post by Oldgringo »

fishman wrote:Good for Dan, and the state of Illnois.
His first challenge will be to segregate Chicago, and its neigboring counties and communities, from Illinois. Once that is accomplished, it should be pretty much a done deal. Illinois is not Chicago and Chicago is definitely not Illinois.

EDIT
wharvey
Senior Member
Posts: 244
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 9:00 am
Location: Natalia, Texas

Re: Hoe and Change for Illinois?

Post by wharvey »

Oldgringo wrote: His first challenge will be to segregate Chicago, and its neigboring counties and communities, from Illinois. Once that is accomplished, it should be pretty much a done deal. Illinois is not Chicago and Chicago is definitely not Illinois.

EDIT
Actually I think the same could be said about the U.S. with regard to NYC, much of Kalifornia, and Chicago. It is interesting how just those 3 liberal areas have so much control over the rest of the country.
Bill Harvey

License to Carry Handgun - Indiana, since Aug 1997
CHL - Texas, since Aug 2011
User avatar
sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Hoe and Change for Illinois?

Post by sjfcontrol »

wharvey wrote:
Oldgringo wrote: His first challenge will be to segregate Chicago, and its neigboring counties and communities, from Illinois. Once that is accomplished, it should be pretty much a done deal. Illinois is not Chicago and Chicago is definitely not Illinois.

EDIT
Actually I think the same could be said about the U.S. with regard to NYC, much of Kalifornia, and Chicago. It is interesting how just those 3 liberal areas have so much control over the rest of the country.

I understand what you're saying, but be aware that most of 'Kalifornia' is not liberal. At least not when measured by square-mile, if not population. If you could just eliminate LA and SF, you'd probably like the rest of CA.
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
User avatar
Pug
Senior Member
Posts: 332
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 10:05 pm
Location: FW

Re: Hope and Change for Illinois?

Post by Pug »

Image
Toorop

Re: Hope and Change for Illinois?

Post by Toorop »

It will not happen. I lived in Illinois for most of my life and now live over the border and frequently travel between the two states. Illinois came very close to having a CCW law passed last year but it did not happen. I don't think it will happen with a stunt like this.

Truth is that the only way I see Illinois gaining a CCW law is when the Supreme court forces it upon Illinois.
User avatar
AEA
Senior Member
Posts: 5110
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:00 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: Hope and Change for Illinois?

Post by AEA »

Pug wrote:Image
You just made it to "The List". :shock: :biggrinjester:
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only.
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
User avatar
Purplehood
Senior Member
Posts: 4638
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Hope and Change for Illinois?

Post by Purplehood »

Toorop wrote:It will not happen. I lived in Illinois for most of my life and now live over the border and frequently travel between the two states. Illinois came very close to having a CCW law passed last year but it did not happen. I don't think it will happen with a stunt like this.
It seems to me that the statement above pretty-much contradicts itself.
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
chasfm11
Senior Member
Posts: 4174
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:01 pm
Location: Northern DFW

Re: Hoe and Change for Illinois?

Post by chasfm11 »

sjfcontrol wrote: I understand what you're saying, but be aware that most of 'Kalifornia' is not liberal. At least not when measured by square-mile, if not population. If you could just eliminate LA and SF, you'd probably like the rest of CA.
I believe you. The problem is that Kalifornia is and has been controlled by Liberals for a very long time. With 40K worth of CCW in a State of 37M (and I do understand that a lot of population lives in dense, Liberal areas) there isn't very much of Conservative statement anywhere to be found on this or any other topic. Forays into any Conservative thinking as represented in the Propositions presented for general votes seem to get stamped out the heavily Liberal Kalifornia Legislature. If the areas outside of LA and SF are something besides Liberal, why doesn't the Legislature reflect that? I still say it is something in the water. :evil2:

If I had to take bets between IL and CA as to which would get general concealed carry first, I'd have to go with IL. They are at least making decent attempts to get the appropriate measures up for votes. I do agree that the fastest path will probably be SCOTUS but surprises can happen.
6/23-8/13/10 -51 days to plastic
Dum Spiro, Spero
User avatar
Purplehood
Senior Member
Posts: 4638
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Hoe and Change for Illinois?

Post by Purplehood »

chasfm11 wrote:
sjfcontrol wrote: I understand what you're saying, but be aware that most of 'Kalifornia' is not liberal. At least not when measured by square-mile, if not population. If you could just eliminate LA and SF, you'd probably like the rest of CA.
I believe you. The problem is that Kalifornia is and has been controlled by Liberals for a very long time. With 40K worth of CCW in a State of 37M (and I do understand that a lot of population lives in dense, Liberal areas) there isn't very much of Conservative statement anywhere to be found on this or any other topic. Forays into any Conservative thinking as represented in the Propositions presented for general votes seem to get stamped out the heavily Liberal Kalifornia Legislature. If the areas outside of LA and SF are something besides Liberal, why doesn't the Legislature reflect that? I still say it is something in the water. :evil2:

If I had to take bets between IL and CA as to which would get general concealed carry first, I'd have to go with IL. They are at least making decent attempts to get the appropriate measures up for votes. I do agree that the fastest path will probably be SCOTUS but surprises can happen.
I have to disagree. Look at the drivel in the form of propositions that constantly come out of the state. Those are direct reflections of the populace.
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
wharvey
Senior Member
Posts: 244
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 9:00 am
Location: Natalia, Texas

Re: Hoe and Change for Illinois?

Post by wharvey »

sjfcontrol wrote: I understand what you're saying, but be aware that most of 'Kalifornia' is not liberal. At least not when measured by square-mile, if not population. If you could just eliminate LA and SF, you'd probably like the rest of CA.
I've been to and through most of Kalifornia and do like most of it. The problem is LA and SF, I'd through in Sacramento also. Just like the only real problem with Illinois is Chicago. Unfortunately that doesn't change the fact that those liberal areas cause many problem for everyone else and not just in those states. It is also sad that some of those liberals from the metro areas are spreading out into other areas of the country. I suspect that before too many more years, a couple of decades at most, many of use will also be complaining about Nevada and Utah.
Bill Harvey

License to Carry Handgun - Indiana, since Aug 1997
CHL - Texas, since Aug 2011
User avatar
puma guy
Senior Member
Posts: 7932
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:23 pm
Location: Near San Jacinto

Re: Hope and Change for Illinois?

Post by puma guy »

Illinois' corruption permeates from the state down, not just in Chicago. Perfect place to spawn presidential candidates. "rlol"
Like Davy Crockett, Roger Keats has the solution. Leave with the message "Gone to Texas!"

http://mchenrycountyblog.com/2011/03/20 ... -illinois/

:txflag:
KAHR PM40/Hoffner IWB and S&W Mod 60/ Galco IWB
NRA Endowment Member, TSRA Life Member,100 Club Life Member,TFC Member
My Faith, My Gun and My Constitution: I cling to all three!
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”