http://www.statesman.com/story-2439558.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Least to say, the said author should not be trusted with pen, let alone with a weapon.I took the course along with several other journalists, including some, like me, who probably would do more harm than good with a gun.
Whacked-out weirdo nutballs are eligible if they have been duly elected by their constituents.)
Well, then, it was worth him spending the time and money ... they "need" to be annoyed sometimes.I own no guns, but I enjoy flashing my handgun license to get into the Capitol and to annoy liberal friends.
...Really? Aside from showing it to my wife no one has ever seen that license. That is part of the concealment. Also, everyone who owns a pistol and has a CHL is a gun nut? Who is this clown?But please don't ignore the conversation-starting potential of impressing (or depressing) friends and family by showing them the state-issued license that certifies you might be a gun nut.
There, I fixed it for you.RPB wrote:Well, then, it was worth him spending the time and money ... they "need" to be annoyed as much as possible.I own no guns, but I enjoy flashing my handgun license to get into the Capitol and to annoy liberal friends.
Beiruty wrote:He is the only Wacho I can see in the room.
Well the part in bold does happen. You can carry in the state capitol.JALLEN wrote:
The state might be better off admitting CHL holders to the Capitol and banning elected officials.
Ken, is that you?LSL wrote:Let's not take one's self too seriously. I believe that Ken Herman has written a humorous column that both supports 2nd Amendment and CHL licensees, takes some good swipes mocking the anti-gun crowd, as well as an honest, self-depreciating view of his own mindset about carrying a handgun.
Now, I remember my instructor advising the importance of "mindset" and weapons.
I offer people take a re-read from a more center-of-the-road perspective, rather from a stance of "here's another media wacko."
In this case, I suggest those thoughts are unwarranted.
alvins wrote:personally i think if you want to go through with your chl you need to be carrying your gun.
chasfm11 wrote:alvins wrote:personally i think if you want to go through with your chl you need to be carrying your gun.![]()
At some level, it seems to me to be demeaning the reason for the special CHL treatment at the Capitol entrance to use it without carrying. The bypass was meant for those with hardware that should not be exposed in public, not for those who believe that they would do more harm than good with a gun.
He did say that he had the best shooting score in his class. Somehow, however, having a CHL and not even owning a gun seems to be a contradiction in terms.
But then everyone would know that you have a gun as you went through the line.alvins wrote:personally i think if you want to go through with your chl you need to be carrying your gun.