Yale professor, ACLU member defends the 2A

[Rrash]

Here is the article.
http://constitution.org/mil/embar2nd.htm
Its nice to see someone study the original intent, as opposed to what they want to read into the Constitution.

Edited. The correct link is up now.

[Purplehood]

Here is the article.
http://m.apnews.com/ap/db_289563/conten ... d=qLoh7Dc8
Its nice to see someone study the original intent, as opposed to what they want to read into the Constitution.

I don't see anything about a Yale Professor on that link. Just a very brief blurb about Biden and his cronies working against 2A.

[Rrash]

Here is the article.
http://m.apnews.com/ap/db_289563/conten ... d=qLoh7Dc8
Its nice to see someone study the original intent, as opposed to what they want to read into the Constitution.

I don't see anything about a Yale Professor on that link. Just a very brief blurb about Biden and his cronies working against 2A.

You are absolutely right. How about posting the correct link, Sorry:)
http://constitution.org/mil/embar2nd.htm

[The Annoyed Man]

Here is the article.
http://m.apnews.com/ap/db_289563/conten ... d=qLoh7Dc8
Its nice to see someone study the original intent, as opposed to what they want to read into the Constitution.

I don't see anything about a Yale Professor on that link. Just a very brief blurb about Biden and his cronies working against 2A.

Reprinted from the Yale Law Journal, Volume 99, pp. 637-659

[Rrash]

TAM, you are correct. Sorry, I was doing too many things at once this morning. UT professor, and former Yale professor, as well as Georgetown, Harvard, NYU, Boston University, and a handful of others.

What I found interesting, and I did not title it right, is that here is an ACLU member, law professor, who doesn't own a gun, and yet he is compelled to defend the 2nd Amendment - stating that we need to interpret by its original intent.

[Purplehood]

That was a fascinating read.
I especially liked the oft-mentioned statement of a populace not needing advanced armaments that would be worthless in the face of a governments nuclear arsenal, while comparing it to the example of Northern Ireland vs. the Nuclear-armed might of Great Britain.