Liberal 2nd amendment view

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

bdickens
Senior Member
Posts: 2807
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:36 am
Location: Houston

Re: Liberal 2nd amendment view

Post by bdickens »

VMI77 wrote:I don't consider people who want to take my means of self-defense away by force via the government to be friends --to me they're enemies.

Exactly.
Byron Dickens
TexasCajun
Senior Member
Posts: 1554
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:58 pm
Location: La Marque, TX

Re: Liberal 2nd amendment view

Post by TexasCajun »

VMI77 wrote:
TexasCajun wrote:You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. But you can hold his head under for a bit just for the fun of it.

We are never going to sway these people. Their minds are made up & nothing is going to change them. But we can influence those that overhear the conversation. So remember to keep calm & hammer the rational points home - repeatedly.

I have a couple of friends of mine on Facebook that view guns & the 2nd amendment similar to the OP. We go round & round on this topic & it usually breaks down into them resorting to veiled name-calling & personal attacks. I don't let that stuff get to me because it's not true. They still haven't caught on to the fact that they are at a big disadvantage in all of this because I really like to debate this & related issues. I don't think that these guys will ever come around, but the ongoing debate may give others a chance to put their own thought into to matter.
I don't consider people who want to take my means of self-defense away by force via the government to be friends --to me they're enemies.
Well I've known these guys for a long time. And other than our differences on this issue, they are pretty good guys. And as demonstrated by their fervent and unwavering stance, they do adhere to a set of principles. So from me, they get a measure of respect because they've earned it. I've found only a few things in life that can truly be put into black & white terms, and by far, friendship dies not qualify.
Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice.
NRA TSRA TFC CHL: 9/22/12, PSC Member: 10/2012
User avatar
anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts: 7877
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: Liberal 2nd amendment view

Post by anygunanywhere »

TexasCajun wrote: I've found only a few things in life that can truly be put into black & white terms, and by far, friendship dies not qualify.
It might not be that way now, but at some point in the future it very well may be so.

Yes, those who have opposing views on freedom and belief in the Constitution and BOR might seem like "good people" but their values might make the decision more easy as the progressive agenda becomes more clear and reaches the pinnacle of their goals.

Anygunanywhere
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
User avatar
VMI77
Senior Member
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: Liberal 2nd amendment view

Post by VMI77 »

anygunanywhere wrote:
TexasCajun wrote: I've found only a few things in life that can truly be put into black & white terms, and by far, friendship dies not qualify.
It might not be that way now, but at some point in the future it very well may be so.

Yes, those who have opposing views on freedom and belief in the Constitution and BOR might seem like "good people" but their values might make the decision more easy as the progressive agenda becomes more clear and reaches the pinnacle of their goals.

Anygunanywhere

Yep, they'll be the first people to turn you in to the Feds for rewards and recognition --all for the good of the country of course.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
bdickens
Senior Member
Posts: 2807
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:36 am
Location: Houston

Re: Liberal 2nd amendment view

Post by bdickens »

TexasCajun wrote:
Well I've known these guys for a long time. And other than our differences on this issue, they are pretty good guys. And as demonstrated by their fervent and unwavering stance, they do adhere to a set of principles. So from me, they get a measure of respect because they've earned it. I've found only a few things in life that can truly be put into black & white terms, and by far, friendship dies not qualify.

Sorry, but people who want to take away any of your basic human rights are not "pretty good guys." They are corrupted by evil.

Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot and Barry "Barack Hussein Obama" Sotero all had a fervent, unwavering commitment to a set of principles. Does that make them "pretty good guys?"
Byron Dickens
User avatar
VMI77
Senior Member
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: Liberal 2nd amendment view

Post by VMI77 »

bdickens wrote:
TexasCajun wrote:
Well I've known these guys for a long time. And other than our differences on this issue, they are pretty good guys. And as demonstrated by their fervent and unwavering stance, they do adhere to a set of principles. So from me, they get a measure of respect because they've earned it. I've found only a few things in life that can truly be put into black & white terms, and by far, friendship dies not qualify.

Sorry, but people who want to take away any of your basic human rights are not "pretty good guys." They are corrupted by evil.

Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot and Barry "Barack Hussein Obama" Sotero all had a fervent, unwavering commitment to a set of principles. Does that make them "pretty good guys?"
I don't know about the other guys, but Adolf loved his dog too, and was a vegetarian. I think Barry would love his dog if he wasn't a sociopath.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
User avatar
Syntyr
Senior Member
Posts: 1662
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 3:54 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Liberal 2nd amendment view

Post by Syntyr »

bdickens wrote:Why do y'all bother? Do you enjoy the frustration or something? Trying to have a rational discussion at all with brain-dead liberal morons ® * is nothing but an exercise in futility.
*Brain-dead liberal morons ® is a registered trademark of the Coalition for Redundancy Coalition. Copyright 2013 Coalition for Redundancy Coalition. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use without the express written consent of the Coalition for Redundancy Coalition is prohibited.
Some of us are ornery ol coots and like to stir the pot :)
Syntyr
"Wherever you go... There you are." - Buckaroo Banzai
"Inconceivable!" - Fizzinni
TexasCajun
Senior Member
Posts: 1554
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:58 pm
Location: La Marque, TX

Re: Liberal 2nd amendment view

Post by TexasCajun »

VMI77 wrote:
anygunanywhere wrote:
TexasCajun wrote: I've found only a few things in life that can truly be put into black & white terms, and by far, friendship dies not qualify.
It might not be that way now, but at some point in the future it very well may be so.

Yes, those who have opposing views on freedom and belief in the Constitution and BOR might seem like "good people" but their values might make the decision more easy as the progressive agenda becomes more clear and reaches the pinnacle of their goals.

Anygunanywhere

Yep, they'll be the first people to turn you in to the Feds for rewards and recognition --all for the good of the country of course.
There would be no need to turn me in as I'm fairly active on this online forum as well as on Facebook & other online theaters. If it comes down to a a problem arises situation, what they say or do will be pretty low on my 'things to worry about' list.
Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice.
NRA TSRA TFC CHL: 9/22/12, PSC Member: 10/2012
TexasCajun
Senior Member
Posts: 1554
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:58 pm
Location: La Marque, TX

Re: Liberal 2nd amendment view

Post by TexasCajun »

VMI77 wrote:
bdickens wrote:
TexasCajun wrote:
Well I've known these guys for a long time. And other than our differences on this issue, they are pretty good guys. And as demonstrated by their fervent and unwavering stance, they do adhere to a set of principles. So from me, they get a measure of respect because they've earned it. I've found only a few things in life that can truly be put into black & white terms, and by far, friendship dies not qualify.

Sorry, but people who want to take away any of your basic human rights are not "pretty good guys." They are corrupted by evil.

Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot and Barry "Barack Hussein Obama" Sotero all had a fervent, unwavering commitment to a set of principles. Does that make them "pretty good guys?"
I don't know about the other guys, but Adolf loved his dog too, and was a vegetarian. I think Barry would love his dog if he wasn't a sociopath.
Again, very little of what I see or encounter on a daily basis fits so neatly in a pretty little box with a cute little bow on top. This is doubly true with my friends. I won't classify them as you all have because 1 - I've known them for a long time, and 2 - We agree on other issues. Are they holding out hope that our society will be reconstructed under a socialist philosophy? I don't believe that to be the case as one of the guys I'm referring to served in the navy during gulf war 1, and the other tends to foo o it form his political beliefs through the prism of his Christian (Methodist, if I'm not mistaken) faith. But were both of these guys falter is that they've fallen for the other side's 'common sense' and 'reasonable' arguments. Yes, they're wrong on this issue. But that doesn't make them evil despots.

I think I'll amend one of my original statements to include: those that can, should continue to debate this issue respectfully. Those that can't should relegate themselves to only preaching to the like-minded choir.
Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice.
NRA TSRA TFC CHL: 9/22/12, PSC Member: 10/2012
User avatar
VMI77
Senior Member
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: Liberal 2nd amendment view

Post by VMI77 »

TexasCajun wrote:
VMI77 wrote:
bdickens wrote:
TexasCajun wrote:
Well I've known these guys for a long time. And other than our differences on this issue, they are pretty good guys. And as demonstrated by their fervent and unwavering stance, they do adhere to a set of principles. So from me, they get a measure of respect because they've earned it. I've found only a few things in life that can truly be put into black & white terms, and by far, friendship dies not qualify.

Sorry, but people who want to take away any of your basic human rights are not "pretty good guys." They are corrupted by evil.

Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot and Barry "Barack Hussein Obama" Sotero all had a fervent, unwavering commitment to a set of principles. Does that make them "pretty good guys?"
I don't know about the other guys, but Adolf loved his dog too, and was a vegetarian. I think Barry would love his dog if he wasn't a sociopath.
Again, very little of what I see or encounter on a daily basis fits so neatly in a pretty little box with a cute little bow on top. This is doubly true with my friends. I won't classify them as you all have because 1 - I've known them for a long time, and 2 - We agree on other issues. Are they holding out hope that our society will be reconstructed under a socialist philosophy? I don't believe that to be the case as one of the guys I'm referring to served in the navy during gulf war 1, and the other tends to foo o it form his political beliefs through the prism of his Christian (Methodist, if I'm not mistaken) faith. But were both of these guys falter is that they've fallen for the other side's 'common sense' and 'reasonable' arguments. Yes, they're wrong on this issue. But that doesn't make them evil despots.

I think I'll amend one of my original statements to include: those that can, should continue to debate this issue respectfully. Those that can't should relegate themselves to only preaching to the like-minded choir.
You're right, I don't know them.....but I don't think being in the military is necessarily a factor. The very first person who personally confronted me and advocated that our system should be replaced with European style socialism was in the military. North Korea has a military. While I would agree that people in the military are generally more conservative, I'd rank the branches from most conservative to most liberal as: Marines, Army, Navy, Air Force.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
bdickens
Senior Member
Posts: 2807
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:36 am
Location: Houston

Re: Liberal 2nd amendment view

Post by bdickens »

Adolf served honorably in the military, too.
Byron Dickens
TexasCajun
Senior Member
Posts: 1554
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:58 pm
Location: La Marque, TX

Re: Liberal 2nd amendment view

Post by TexasCajun »

I envy those of you that live in a completely binary world - where everything reduces to either 1 or 0. In such an existence no rational thought has to be made, judgment isn't necessary, and reason can be eliminated. Ohhh to not have to burden myself with trying to reconcile people or situations that come close to fitting a particular context but that don't meet every single one of a couple hundred criteria. Why, I could simply toss them into this bin or the other one!!! And I wouldn't have to give it a second thought to boot!

Woe is me that is cursed with a reason and intellect that can see not only merit to both sides of an argument, but also can see beyond absolutes. I curse my innate pragmatism that forces me to look beyond emotion & irrationality. Would that I could pluck out these eyes that see many shades of Greg in addition to a multitude of colors around me!

I guess we can't all be so lucky as some of you.....
Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice.
NRA TSRA TFC CHL: 9/22/12, PSC Member: 10/2012
bdickens
Senior Member
Posts: 2807
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:36 am
Location: Houston

Re: Liberal 2nd amendment view

Post by bdickens »

I will tolerate people who think gay people should have the right to be as miserable as everybody else (thank you, Kinky Friedman).

I will tolerate people who think welfare helps poor people.

I will tolerate people who think that ManMade GlobalWarming® is real and that by driving a Prius they are saving the planet.

I will even tolerate people who think Karl Marx had some good ideas.

I will not, however, tolerate people who want to deny me my fundamental human rights, one of which is defending myself from harm by whatever means necessary.
Byron Dickens
User avatar
VMI77
Senior Member
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: Liberal 2nd amendment view

Post by VMI77 »

TexasCajun wrote:I envy those of you that live in a completely binary world - where everything reduces to either 1 or 0. In such an existence no rational thought has to be made, judgment isn't necessary, and reason can be eliminated. Ohhh to not have to burden myself with trying to reconcile people or situations that come close to fitting a particular context but that don't meet every single one of a couple hundred criteria. Why, I could simply toss them into this bin or the other one!!! And I wouldn't have to give it a second thought to boot!

Woe is me that is cursed with a reason and intellect that can see not only merit to both sides of an argument, but also can see beyond absolutes. I curse my innate pragmatism that forces me to look beyond emotion & irrationality. Would that I could pluck out these eyes that see many shades of Greg in addition to a multitude of colors around me!

I guess we can't all be so lucky as some of you.....
I bow to you oh great one: to your intellect, your rationality, your reason, your tolerance, your great vision, and your pragmatism. Obviously from what you tell us you are a superior being, and we mere mortals are judgmental, irrational, unreasonable, intolerant, impractical, blind, and stupid. :tiphat: I do count myself lucky however. :cheers2:
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”