All this means to me is that at some time in the future, we may have to deal with "King George" -- again!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
bdickens wrote:Well, Whoopdie Doo!
We went to war a couple of centuries ago so that we didn't have to deal with the English throne and yet we still can't shake our obsession with it.
What's this "Immigration Bill" about that I keep hearing of in this country?CHLLady wrote:
{snip}
Their society might work to their benefit if they weren't letting in masses of poverty stricken immigrants that drain the coffers.
Ok -- NOW I get it!psijac wrote:[ Image ]
But, they care so much about us. They named the baby after Zimmerman!cheezit wrote:i thought there was a war so we didnt have to care about the royal famly any longer.
Yes, point well made, but the whole of their island can fit into Texas 2.8 times. Lol. They can't support the influx of non-contributors. Not that we can continue either.Oldgringo wrote:What's this "Immigration Bill" about that I keep hearing of in this country?CHLLady wrote:
{snip}
Their society might work to their benefit if they weren't letting in masses of poverty stricken immigrants that drain the coffers.
Considering most of my ancestors at one time or another threw a spear or took a shot at the English all I care to say about royalty is:sjfcontrol wrote:Apparently the Royal Couple have decided on a name. Prince George of Cambridge.
All this means to me is that at some time in the future, we may have to deal with "King George" -- again!